Brilliant Accessibility Website - is it?

Dec 15 2021

Recent news heading 'Sony Launches Brilliant Accessibility Website for PS5, PS4' - shouldn't the page be 'accessible' ?

This continues to puzzle us...

A great brand (like SONY) launches what is a key page in terms of demonstrating their commitment to D&I - who / how are they checking even the basics of accessibility compliance before page is released?

In running the page through the new Sitemorse engine, there are over 1,200 Level A failures, how can this be?

  • We have checked the audit, errors confirmed.
  • The page, how was it checked ?
  • Has someone said 'it is all OK' ?

A number of the 'errors' are perhaps quite technical - is this the fault of the standard ?

Website Article

https://www.pushsquare.com/news/2021/12/sony-launches-brilliant-accessibility-website-for-ps5-ps4 (opens in a new window)

Recent articles

Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Digital Accessibility Regulations Across the US and Beyond

12 Apr 2024

CA Bill 1757 / Accessibility Impact

26 Mar 2024

Navigating the European Accessibility Act

12 Mar 2024

Webinar // Tridion and Accessibility

24 Feb 2024

Testing mobile apps, a service to try

07 Feb 2024

Navigating Vendor Accountability

15 Dec 2023

Steps to Stars Walkthrough of the AAAtraq System

29 Nov 2023

Is Content Management one of the route causes of accessibility failure?

24 Oct 2023

Compliance vs. Legal Risks: Protected or Vulnerable?

20 Sep 2023

Web Accessibility (new '2.2' guidelines) AAAtraq service impact

05 Sep 2023