Brilliant Accessibility Website - is it?

Dec 15 2021

Recent news heading 'Sony Launches Brilliant Accessibility Website for PS5, PS4' - shouldn't the page be 'accessible' ?

This continues to puzzle us...

A great brand (like SONY) launches what is a key page in terms of demonstrating their commitment to D&I - who / how are they checking even the basics of accessibility compliance before page is released?

In running the page through the new Sitemorse engine, there are over 1,200 Level A failures, how can this be?

  • We have checked the audit, errors confirmed.
  • The page, how was it checked ?
  • Has someone said 'it is all OK' ?

A number of the 'errors' are perhaps quite technical - is this the fault of the standard ?

Website Article

https://www.pushsquare.com/news/2021/12/sony-launches-brilliant-accessibility-website-for-ps5-ps4 (opens in a new window)

Recent articles

ADA Title II digital accessibility deadline // US public bodies

05 Jan 2026

Content decay: why websites lose value after launch

17 Dec 2025

Lawler, Correa Unveil ADA Reform to Boost Access and Protect Small Businesses

12 Dec 2025

Sit Back… It’s PDF Magic Time 🤗 | A Little “Listen with Laura”

09 Dec 2025

Tackling PDF Sprawl: Continuous Content Assessment and Visitor-Focused Delivery for Sustainable Compliance

09 Dec 2025

Ahead of the January sales, research reveals how accessibility failures drive users away

04 Dec 2025

AI-Driven ADA Claims Are About to Accelerate

28 Nov 2025

PDF backlog, dealt with. Minutes to an 80% improvement

20 Nov 2025

Understanding Why Unstructured Documents Put Your Brand at Risk

19 Nov 2025

Your Service: Adding more oooommmph. Servers, new search and stuff.

17 Nov 2025