Multiple universities targeted by the same plaintiff, plus a wedding specialist and bar franchisor face class actions

Sep 29 2022

Our weekly roundup of recent ADA litigation cases.

This week, Elon University is up against one of the country’s most prolific filers of ADA-related lawsuits, mobile accessibility is in the spotlight and a class action is brought against a wedding specialist.

Dozens of universities sued over website accessibility

The plaintiff in the lawsuit Emanuel Delacruz v Elon University has also filled dozens of other lawsuits based on accessibility for blind and visually impaired users. The assumption might be that Higher Education and university establishments have this in hand, but the reality is the risk of providing an inaccessible website is just as real for them as it is for other types of organisations.

https://www.elonnewsnetwork.com/article/2022/09/elon-among-dozens-of-universities-sued-over-website-accessibility (opens in a new window)

Emanuel Delacruz v. Elon University

https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/22924458-govuscourtsnysd58410510/?embed=1&responsive=1&title=1 (opens in a new window)

Forced to use traditional brick and mortar retailers

When visiting the site of wedding specialist, Zola, the plaintiff in the class action against them found the following:

‘Zola.com contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually impaired customers to use the website.’

It was claimed that due to Zola’s inaccessibility the plaintiff and blind customers must ‘spend time, energy, and/or money to make their purchases at traditional brick-and mortar retailers’.

Jenny Hwang v. Zola, Inc.

https://topclassactions.com/disability-class-action-lawsuit/zola-class-action-claims-website-inaccessible-to-visually-impaired-blind-consumers/ (opens in a new window)

Don’t forget your mobile

The pending lawsuit that has been brought against bar franchisor Brass Tap, acts as a reminder to all that focus website development and compliance efforts on desktop at the expense of mobile devices.

In this case, it was stated that the plaintiff uses ‘the internet and a mobile device to help him navigate a world of goods, products and services like the sighted.’ However, when trying to navigate the site https://www.brasstapbeerbar.com (opens in a new window), found that the mobile site didn’t properly interact with his screen reader.

Watson v. Brass Tap Franchisor, LLC et al.

Recent articles

Lawler, Correa Unveil ADA Reform to Boost Access and Protect Small Businesses

12 Dec 2025

Sit Back… It’s PDF Magic Time 🤗 | A Little “Listen with Laura”

09 Dec 2025

Tackling PDF Sprawl: Continuous Content Assessment and Visitor-Focused Delivery for Sustainable Compliance

09 Dec 2025

Ahead of the January sales, research reveals how accessibility failures drive users away

04 Dec 2025

AI-Driven ADA Claims Are About to Accelerate

28 Nov 2025

PDF backlog, dealt with. Minutes to an 80% improvement

20 Nov 2025

Understanding Why Unstructured Documents Put Your Brand at Risk

19 Nov 2025

Your Service: Adding more oooommmph. Servers, new search and stuff.

17 Nov 2025

The EU Accessibility Act Is Now in Force: Is Your Website Compliant?

30 Oct 2025

Forrester’s 2025 Accessibility Findings Echo What AAAtraq Has Known for Years

24 Oct 2025