Multiple universities targeted by the same plaintiff, plus a wedding specialist and bar franchisor face class actions

Sep 29 2022

Our weekly roundup of recent ADA litigation cases.

This week, Elon University is up against one of the country’s most prolific filers of ADA-related lawsuits, mobile accessibility is in the spotlight and a class action is brought against a wedding specialist.

Dozens of universities sued over website accessibility

The plaintiff in the lawsuit Emanuel Delacruz v Elon University has also filled dozens of other lawsuits based on accessibility for blind and visually impaired users. The assumption might be that Higher Education and university establishments have this in hand, but the reality is the risk of providing an inaccessible website is just as real for them as it is for other types of organisations.

https://www.elonnewsnetwork.com/article/2022/09/elon-among-dozens-of-universities-sued-over-website-accessibility (opens in a new window)

Emanuel Delacruz v. Elon University

https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/22924458-govuscourtsnysd58410510/?embed=1&responsive=1&title=1 (opens in a new window)

Forced to use traditional brick and mortar retailers

When visiting the site of wedding specialist, Zola, the plaintiff in the class action against them found the following:

‘Zola.com contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually impaired customers to use the website.’

It was claimed that due to Zola’s inaccessibility the plaintiff and blind customers must ‘spend time, energy, and/or money to make their purchases at traditional brick-and mortar retailers’.

Jenny Hwang v. Zola, Inc.

https://topclassactions.com/disability-class-action-lawsuit/zola-class-action-claims-website-inaccessible-to-visually-impaired-blind-consumers/ (opens in a new window)

Don’t forget your mobile

The pending lawsuit that has been brought against bar franchisor Brass Tap, acts as a reminder to all that focus website development and compliance efforts on desktop at the expense of mobile devices.

In this case, it was stated that the plaintiff uses ‘the internet and a mobile device to help him navigate a world of goods, products and services like the sighted.’ However, when trying to navigate the site https://www.brasstapbeerbar.com (opens in a new window), found that the mobile site didn’t properly interact with his screen reader.

Watson v. Brass Tap Franchisor, LLC et al.

Recent articles

Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Digital Accessibility Regulations Across the US and Beyond

12 Apr 2024

CA Bill 1757 / Accessibility Impact

26 Mar 2024

Navigating the European Accessibility Act

12 Mar 2024

Webinar // Tridion and Accessibility

24 Feb 2024

Testing mobile apps, a service to try

07 Feb 2024

Navigating Vendor Accountability

15 Dec 2023

Steps to Stars Walkthrough of the AAAtraq System

29 Nov 2023

Is Content Management one of the route causes of accessibility failure?

24 Oct 2023

Compliance vs. Legal Risks: Protected or Vulnerable?

20 Sep 2023

Web Accessibility (new '2.2' guidelines) AAAtraq service impact

05 Sep 2023