Multiple universities targeted by the same plaintiff, plus a wedding specialist and bar franchisor face class actions

Sep 29 2022

Our weekly roundup of recent ADA litigation cases.

This week, Elon University is up against one of the country’s most prolific filers of ADA-related lawsuits, mobile accessibility is in the spotlight and a class action is brought against a wedding specialist.

Dozens of universities sued over website accessibility

The plaintiff in the lawsuit Emanuel Delacruz v Elon University has also filled dozens of other lawsuits based on accessibility for blind and visually impaired users. The assumption might be that Higher Education and university establishments have this in hand, but the reality is the risk of providing an inaccessible website is just as real for them as it is for other types of organisations.

https://www.elonnewsnetwork.com/article/2022/09/elon-among-dozens-of-universities-sued-over-website-accessibility (opens in a new window)

Emanuel Delacruz v. Elon University

https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/22924458-govuscourtsnysd58410510/?embed=1&responsive=1&title=1 (opens in a new window)

Forced to use traditional brick and mortar retailers

When visiting the site of wedding specialist, Zola, the plaintiff in the class action against them found the following:

‘Zola.com contains significant access barriers that make it difficult if not impossible for blind and visually impaired customers to use the website.’

It was claimed that due to Zola’s inaccessibility the plaintiff and blind customers must ‘spend time, energy, and/or money to make their purchases at traditional brick-and mortar retailers’.

Jenny Hwang v. Zola, Inc.

https://topclassactions.com/disability-class-action-lawsuit/zola-class-action-claims-website-inaccessible-to-visually-impaired-blind-consumers/ (opens in a new window)

Don’t forget your mobile

The pending lawsuit that has been brought against bar franchisor Brass Tap, acts as a reminder to all that focus website development and compliance efforts on desktop at the expense of mobile devices.

In this case, it was stated that the plaintiff uses ‘the internet and a mobile device to help him navigate a world of goods, products and services like the sighted.’ However, when trying to navigate the site https://www.brasstapbeerbar.com (opens in a new window), found that the mobile site didn’t properly interact with his screen reader.

Watson v. Brass Tap Franchisor, LLC et al.

Recent articles

Trump Administration Sued (surprise …😉) Over ASL Interpreter Snub

23 Jun 2025

How EAA Complaints Work Across Five Key EU Countries

11 Jun 2025

New ADA Rules Require School Websites to Be Fully Accessible

10 Jun 2025

V500 Scorecard Reveals Gaps in Digital Readiness Ahead of EAA Deadline

09 Jun 2025

Accessibility Gains Ground in Cybersecurity: Funka Foundation Secures Role in EU Standards Development

04 Jun 2025

Preparing for the New Wave of Accessibility Laws

29 May 2025

Why U.S. Companies Operating in the EU Must Act Now on Digital Accessibility

29 May 2025

Designing for Inclusion: How Digital Accessibility Supports the Autism Community

25 May 2025

The ROI of Accessibility: The Value of Digital Access in an AI-Driven Economy

25 May 2025

Digital Accessibility Lawsuits Are Surging, And No One Is Exempt

20 May 2025