Goldman Sachs and L’Oreal both face accessibility lawsuits

Sep 08 2022

Our weekly roundup of recent ADA litigation cases

This week we place the spotlight on a couple of big names that have made the legal press, along with the fashion retail and hospitality sectors.

A common thread runs through all the cases, highlighting a reoccurring accessibility issue for visually impaired people who require good quality alt text for the screen readers they use to understand a website.

Big names, same issue, same day

Two major brands have class actions taken against them on the same day. On August 15th 2022, in two separate New York federal courts, both organizations faced the claim that their website is not accessible to visually impaired people using a screen reader.

https://topclassactions.com/disability-class-action-lawsuit/goldman-sachs-loreal-class-actions-allege-website-inaccessible-to-blind-users/ (opens in a new window)

Retail Fashion

Children’s clothing retailer Lisa Frank and plus size women’s clothing retailer Chic Soul have both been in court dealing with class action complaints related to alt text. The correct use of alt text is important for visually impaired people as it provides a written description of the visual image.

In the case of Lisa Frank the Plaintiff claimed that many of the features on the website lacked alt text. Whilst in the Chic Soul case, it was claimed that inaccurate alt text is being used for graphics and that there were access barriers from inaccessible drop-down menus and a transaction system that required a mouse.

Bryan Velazquez v. Lisa Frank, Inc.

https://topclassactions.com/disability-class-action-lawsuit/lisa-frank-class-action-alleges-website-not-accessible-to-blind-visually-impaired/ (opens in a new window)

Veronica Maddy v. Chic Soul, LLC.

https://topclassactions.com/disability-class-action-lawsuit/chic-soul-class-action-claims-website-inaccessible-to-blind-visually-impaired-users/ (opens in a new window)

Hotel 'Booking' Hell

Baker McKenzie are representing Melia Hotels Orlando LLC in case where an number of web accessibility issues have been raised. Further to trying to book at the hotel, the Plaintiff who is visually impaired, claims he was denied full access to the site. A broad range of issues were raised, including a lack of alt text on images, missing ID descriptions (for screen readers) for the Rooms-Rates and Gallery, poor colour contrast and no announcement for the discounts available.

Mahlberg v. Melia Hotels Orlando, LLC.

https://legal-mag.com/2022/08/12/baker-mckenzie-defending-orlando-melia-hotel-from-website-accessibility-suit/ (opens in a new window)

Interested in AAAtraq? Watch our video to find out more.
Watch

Recent articles

Western Union and Overtime Sports face accessibility class actions, whilst Optavia decides to settle

22 Sep 2022

Converse, Hello Fresh and Colgate University all face accessibility lawsuits

15 Sep 2022

Taking the correct steps towards ADA compliance

14 Sep 2022

How AAAtraq Deals with your Accessibility Statement

12 Sep 2022

Goldman Sachs and L’Oreal both face accessibility lawsuits

08 Sep 2022

New Digital Accessibility Law Improves Education for Millions of Disabled Illinois Students

05 Aug 2022

Congress ADA Risk INDEX | How Inclusive Are Congressional Websites?

04 Aug 2022

“Don’t be afraid of your vendors: Ask questions!”

02 Aug 2022

Can Web Developers Be Sued for the Inaccessible Websites They Create for Clients?

28 Jul 2022

AAAtraq announces CLIC Collaboration

27 Jul 2022